Mueller Exposes Chomsky/Herman #Sourcing of Fake News as #HegelianDialectic and #ReversiveBlockade

The Mueller hearing exposed an example of the #ProblemReactionSolution method of the erroneous #Sourcing of #FakeNews we have been subject to from the entire #MainstreamMedia for years.

In fact, in its capacity as #FakeNews it is an object lesson in propaganda as it also gives us a perfect example of the notorious #ReversiveBlockade and sets the bar for the ‘turning upside down’ of the law under globalisation.

In the recent hearing, Mueller, apart from his refusal to answer questions on the most important issues, such as the illegitimate #Sourcing of the entire investigation in a phoney ‘dossier’ used in the FISA application, actually appeared to know very little, if anything at all, about the content of what was supposed to be his own ‘investigation’.

Despite it being called the ‘Mueller Report’ this situation indicates his use as a #Strawman put in place to lend legitimacy in the form of #Transfer and #Testimonial propaganda of the #AssociationFallacy, onto a group of highly partisan lawyers who compiled the report largely from #FakeNews sources they themselves created, or events that were engineered though rogue intelligence sources, and given weight by #Transfer and #Testimonial propaganda of the #AssociationFallacy.

“Robert Swan Mueller III…is an American lawyer and government official who served as the sixth Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation from 2001 to 2013.

A graduate of Princeton University and New York University, Mueller served as a Marine Corps officer during the Vietnam War, receiving a Bronze Star for heroism and a Purple Heart. He subsequently attended the University of Virginia School of Law. Mueller is a registered Republican in Washington, D.C., and was appointed and reappointed to Senate-confirmed positions by presidents George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

Mueller has served both in government and private practice. He was an assistant United States attorney; a United States attorney; United States assistant attorney general for the Criminal Division; a homicide prosecutor in Washington, D.C.; acting United States deputy attorney general; and director of the FBI. Mueller was also a partner at the D.C. law firm WilmerHale before being appointed as special counsel.

On May 17, 2017, Mueller was appointed by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein as special counsel overseeing an investigation into allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election and related matters. Mueller submitted his report to Attorney General William Barr on March 22, 2019. On April 18, 2019, the Department of Justice released the special counsel’s final report. On May 29, 2019, Mueller officially resigned his post and the Office of the Special Counsel was closed.”

Robert Mueller Wikipedia Biography as at 25th July 2019

Robert Mueller’s history, as presented here by Wikipedia and asserted continually for over two years in the Mainstream Media depicting him as a hero, lends the ‘investigation’ legitimacy despite its origin in the phony ‘#Pissgate’ dossier by affording him as #SacredCow status:

#SacredCow Definition:

“a sacred cow

Someone or something that is considered to have a status that allows it avoid any criticism or questioning. The phraserefers to the veneration of the cow in Hinduism.”

https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/sacred+cow

This status, while likely legitimately earned, and affording him massive #PoliticalCapital and #CulturalCapital protects his position as a #Strawman as the media ‘face’ of the Mueller Investigation,

“straw man

n. 1) a person to whom title to property or a business interest is transferred for the sole purpose of concealing the true owner and/or the business machinations of the parties. Thus, the straw man has no real interest or participation but is merely a passive stand in for a real participant who secretly controls activities.

Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved

In this case a team of partisan lawyer activists used the media as a weapon creating a closed circuit feedback loop of lies, which we have identified as Hegelian Dialectic

This was apparently not even anything to do with Mueller, apart from using his name.

Fox News Contributor and former Representative Trey Gowdy (R-SC) stated that Mueller “clearly” didn’t write the Mueller report.

Gowdy said Democrats are “not closer to anything other than wishing this had never happened. Bad facts make for bad witnesses. Bad witnesses make for bad hearings, and this one was an abject, miserable failure. The person who learned the most about the Mueller report today was Bob Mueller. I say that sadly. He was not engaged. He didn’t interview the witnesses. He clearly didn’t write the report.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2019/07/24/gowdy-mueller-clearly-didnt-write-the-report/

…this attempted Palace Coup has been described by President Trump as a #Witchhunt, an assertion apparently now verified.

…and due to the use of partisan activist lawyers:

“witch hunt noun
Definition of witch hunt
1 : a searching out for persecution of persons accused of witchcraft
2 : the searching out and deliberate harassment of those (such as political opponents) with unpopular views“

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/witch%20hunt [Added Emphasis]

This was executed by a team of lawyers who, all being Democrats, failed to live up to the legal standard for an appearance of non-bias and who apparently worked closely in concert with the media and rogue intelligence in an attempt to manufacture a consensus, thus taking the Chomsky and Herman definition of #Sourcing propaganda described in Manufacturing Consent, to a new level of intrigue:

“the reliance of the media on information provided by government, business, and “experts” funded and approved by these primary sources and agents of power[…]

The mass media are drawn into a symbiotic relationship with powerful sources of information by economic necessity and reciprocity of interest. The media need a steady, reliable flow of the raw material of news.

They have daily news demands and imperative news schedules that they must meet. […] The White House, the Pentagon, and the State Department, in Washington, D.C., are central nodes of … news activity.

… These bureaucracies turn out a large volume of material that meets the demands of news organizations for reliable, scheduled flows. Mark Fishman calls this “the principle of bureaucratic affinity:

“only other bureaucracies can satisfy the input needs of a news bureaucracy.”

Government and corporate sources also have the great merit of being recognizable and credible by their status and prestige. This is important to the mass media…. they need material that can be portrayed as presumptively accurate.

Hermann & Chomsky, ‘Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy Of The Mass Media 1988‘

What has been done with the Mueller report pioneers a new and vicious, weaponised version of #Sourcing in which colloquial (everyday) language, in this case the words ‘Exoneration’ and ‘Collusion’ , after being misused by the ‘Mueller team’ in ‘his’ report, and used by pundits as if they were legal terminology by lawyers and government actors as pundits on Mainstream Media, Social Media and Big Tech, where, on the back of their misuse by the Mueller team of partisan lawyers, they use the words repeatedly, as if to appear that they exist in a legal framework, to masquerade as legal language, in an attempt to ‘convict’ Trump in the ‘kangaroo court’ of public opinion, in Mainstream Media and on Social Media and Big Tech using the loaded terms ‘collusion’ and ‘exoneration’.

TURNER: You…threw overboard the word collusion because it’s not a legal term. You would not conclude because collusion was not a legal term?

MUELLER: Well, it depends on how you want to use the word. In a general parlance, people can think of it that way, if you’re talking about in a criminal statute arena, you can’t. Because it really — it’s much more accurately described as conspiracy.

TURNER: All right. So in your words, it’s not a legal term, so you didn’t put it in your conclusion. Correct?

TURNER: Mr. Mueller, I want to focus on one word in your report…. It’s exonerate. The report states accordingly, while [it] does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it does not exonerate him. Now… you’ve already agreed with Mr. Ratcliffe that exonerate is not a legal term, that there is not a legal test for this.

So I have a question… does the attorney general have the power or authority to exonerate? What I’m putting up here is the United States code. This is where the attorney general gets his power and the Constitution and the annotated cases of these, which then starts, we even went to your law school, I went to Case Western, but I thought maybe your law school teaches it differently, and we got the criminal law textbook from your law school.

Mr. Mueller, nowhere in these — because we had these scanned — is there a process or description on exonerate. There’s no office of exoneration at the attorney general’s office. There’s no certificate at the bottom of his desk. Mr. Mueller, would you agree with me that the attorney general does not have the power to exonerate?

MUELLER: I’m going to pass on that.

TURNER: Why?

MUELLER: Because it embroils us in a legal discussion, and I’m not prepared to do a legal discussion in that arena.

TURNER: Mr. Mueller, you would not disagree with me when I say that there is no place that the attorney general has the power to exonerate and he’s not been given that authority?

MUELLER: I’m not going to — I take your question.

TURNER: Great. The one thing that I guess, is that the attorney general probably knows he can’t exonerate either, and that’s the part that kind of confuses me. Because if the attorney general doesn’t have the power to exonerate, then you don’t have the power to exonerate, and I believe he knows he doesn’t have the power to exonerate.

And so this is that I don’t understand. If your report is to the attorney general, and the attorney general doesn’t have the power to exonerate and he does not — and he knows you do not have that power, you don’t have to tell him that you’re not exonerating the president. He knows this already. So then that kind of changes the context of the report.

MUELLER: No. We included in the report for exactly that reason. He may not know it and should.

TURNER: So you believe that Attorney Bill Barr believes somewhere in the hallways of the Department of Justice, there’s an office of exoneration?

MUELLER: No, that’s not what I said.

TURNER: Well I believe he knows and I don’t believe you put that in there for Mr. Barr. I think you put that in there for exactly what I’m going to discuss next, and that is, so “The Washington Post” yesterday, when speaking of your report, the article said Trump could not be exonerated of trying to obstruct the investigation itself.

Trump could not be exonerated. Now, that statement is correct, Mr. Mueller isn’t it, in that no one can be exonerated? The reporter wrote this. This reporter can’t be exonerated. Mr. Mueller, you can’t be exonerated. In fact, in our criminal justice system, there is no power or authority to exonerate.

Now, this is my concern, Mr. Mueller, this is the headline on all of the news channels while you were testifying today Mueller, Trump was not exonerated.

Now, Mr. Mueller, what you know is that this [you] can’t say Mueller exonerated Trump. Because you don’t have the power or authority to exonerate Trump, you had no more power to declare him exonerated than you have the power to declare him Anderson Cooper.

So the problem that I have here is that, since there’s no one in the criminal justice system that has that power — the president pardons, he doesn’t exonerate; courts and juries don’t declare innocent, they declare not guilty, they don’t even declare exoneration — the statement about exoneration is misleading and it’s meaningless. And it — it colors this investigation; one word, out of the entire portion of your report, and it’s a meaningless word that has no legal meaning and it has colored your entire report.

Transcript of Mueller Testimony

Thus, through #Sourcing from a team of partisan lawyers, who failed to find evidence of collusion, is how the media tried to overthrow a duly elected president through propaganda, in a collaboration of the judiciary with the media to create a false reality, echoing the sinister Soviet show trials,

…but updated to a new media age in which the communication channels have been taken over and infiltrated by globalist concerns to supply the Chomsky/Hermann qualifiers for #Sourcing as:

“the reliance of the media on information provided by government, business, and “experts” funded and approved by these primary sources and agents of power…”

Hermann & Chomsky, ‘Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy Of The Mass Media 1988‘

…to levels of extreme bias using quasi -legal mumbo-jumbo to miselad the public, and whip-up mass hysteria to medieval levels against anything non-globalist:

…as a mass culture of self-righteous indignation and outrage as a narcissistic pose of media -led vanity:

…especially against Trump, and which is characterised by:

Selective coverage [which] refers to disproportionate editorial assigning and authorizing of stories we might characterize as Trump negative.

Presentational omission of counterarguments [which] refers to an unwillingness to seek out and then provide, within the stories themselves, the highest caliber of arguments in support of Trump’s perspective.

Tendentious characterizations [which] refers to an injudicious propensity to negatively interpret, analyze, and evaluate Trump’s words or actions, or to do so in an exaggerated or overdone way.

A disinclination toward meaningful self-criticism [which] just has to do with the media’s incapacity to publicly reflect on its own shortcomings, missteps, blind spots, etc.

https://arcdigital.media/is-the-media-biased-against-donald-trump-72109d6423cb

…all of which, in a climate of manufactured hysteria against any diversity of thought or deed which is non-globalist, non-politically correct is crushed.

A climate in which Google, who censor this site from search engine listings while claiming under law to be a neutral search engine rather than a publisher, have changed the meaning of the word Nationalism to

identification with one’s own nation and support for its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations.

…in an Orwellian power-grab over information, and anything which does not celebrate phoney ‘diversity’, is crushed, using the Utopian globalist notions of ‘diversity’ :

…as a cover of kitsch sentimentality:

” Human nature demands that vile matters be haloed by an over-compensatory mystique in order to silence one’s conscience and to deceive consciousness and critical faculties, whether one’s own or those of others.”

The importance of the realisation of our situation, and the methods in use in both situations, is paramount. #HegelianDialectic as well as the #ReversiveBlockade, effectively ‘inoculating’ the masses against the REAL Russian Collusion, and REAL diversity.

Emphatically insisting upon something which is the opposite of the truth, this blocks the average person’s mind from perceiving the truth. In accordance with the dictates of healthy common sense, he starts searching for meaning in the “golden mean” between the truth and its opposite, winding up with some satisfactory counterfeit. People who think like this do not realize that this was precisely the intent of the person who subjected them to this method. […] Use of this method can be included within the above-mentioned psychological knowledge developed by psychopaths concerning the weaknesses of human nature and the art of leading others into error. Where they are in rule, this method is used with virtuosity, and to an extent conterminous with their power.

Political Ponerology: Andew Lobacewski [Added Emphasis]

This has become so widespread that it is the rule, it just takes a simple exercise of will to realise the truth.

The law of inversion is something we have discovered from bitter experience.

Sometimes clarity comes from the most unfortunate circumstance.